Skip to content


No Turning Back: Alice in Afghanistan

5 comments

As the American Civil War progressed, Abraham Lincoln despaired of the apparent inability of Union generals to take the fight to the confederacy.  Some generals were blatantly political while others could not withstand the carnage resulting from improved weaponry and bludgeoning tactics.  Then came Grant.

The enduring image of U. S. Grant is of the General calmly whittling away on a stick as the battle of the Wilderness rages around him.  An officer weeps as he informs Grant of the killing fields yet Grant is unmoved in his quest to pursue Lee to the finish.  Famously for Grant, there was “No turning back.”

Grant apparently was amply possessed of key attributes for a fighting man:  he was clear eyed, entirely strait forward and given to speaking the truth.  Lincoln, a politician first and foremost, rewarded Grant’s doggedness and clung to him as to a raft in a hurricane.

How times do change.

Major General Peter Fuller, a senior US Army Commander in Afghanistan, was fired from his job the other day for apparently expressing understandable outrage about Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s recent revelation that his country would support Pakistan were they to go to war with the US.
Fuller’s quotes originated in a Politico interview where he castigated the Afghans for being out of touch.  He is now out of a job, effectively for speaking the truth.

While it may be best to leave the diplomacy to the diplomats, one would hope that clear thinking and frank speaking would continue to be the province of those who lead troops into battle.  The State Department can afford to engage in grotesque  hyperbole but generals who make life and death decisions should be rewarded, not fired, for verbalizing the literally fatal dichotomy which exists between Afghan leaders and the interests of their country.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta approved of the decision thus making the Obama administration, and ultimately the President himself, complicit in punishing a candid forthrightness that is sorely missing as we send our troops to “Alice’s Afghanistan.”

Abraham Lincoln may have joked about his fighting general’s “indiscretion”, were he thought it so.  But fire him?

Never.

 

 

Credit: (Globe and Mail, Politico, Guardian)

Firing Line: Three More Years of This?

No comments

Twelve more Americans were killed yesterday in Afghanistan in a suicide bombing as they were being transported in an armored vehicle. Yesterday’s killings included five US combat troops.

The bombing occurred not in some far off province or in a supposed Taliban stronghold, but rather in downtown Kabul on Darulaman Road, also the site of a previous similar bombing that killed five Americans in 2010.

According to the NYT, Hamid Karzai, the Afghan president, issued a statement that condemned the incident while failing to mention the US losses.  Karzai infuriated Americans last week when he said that Afghanistan would be on the side of the Pakistanis if they were to go to war against the US.

Karzai’s behavior, both his lack of concern and his commitment to the Pakistani’s, is at least tacit incitement for anti-American Afghans in their acts of terrorism in  Kabul and elsewhere.  The anemic (and pathetic) US diplomatic response is to chalk his outrageous behavior up to comments aimed for internal Afghan consumption.  Certainly the relatives of the dead killed yesterday will find perfect logic and great comfort in that explanation.

The current Obama/Panetta line is most US troops out of Afghanistan by 2014.  That means US troops have three more years to survive in an environment where even the capital city is under siege and where the president of the country ignores our losses and sides with our potential enemies as the US engages in tortured diplomatic explanations that a third-grader would question.

If this is winning we should try losing for awhile.

 

(Sources: Getty Images and NYT)